False Rumors: Harassment of Cons by Heather Vandagriff and Peyton Waukau (@BewareCreepyVAs)
D.C. Douglas dispels years-old online anonymous claims: verified facts, no legal actions, and a spotless record across 130+ conventions.
Summary & Key Facts
TL;DR:
The allegations are untrue.
“Hurt people hurt others.”
ago, a former acquaintance began anonymously spreading false rumors about D.C. Douglas online, accusing him of misconduct. Then ago, a former fan began recirculating those rumors for her own benefit.
At no point has any actual victim ever come forward, and no official complaints have ever been filed against D.C. Douglas.
Despite the seriousness of the claims, after there are:
- No police reports
- No civil complaints
- No identified victims
- No corroborating witnesses
In fact, over 130 conventions have booked D.C. Douglas without a single incident, complaint, or concern regarding his behavior. He has a reputation as a fun, engaging, affable guest who is liked by both staff and fans.
Over the years, Peyton Waukau and Heather Vandagriff’s behavior has followed a pattern common in online harassment campaigns: escalating claims when initial ones fail, hiding behind anonymity, and creating the illusion of support with fake accounts. No real victims. No real evidence. Only a calculated attempt to cause professional harm.
Most conventions are now familiar with the tactics used by these individuals — contacting events anonymously with shocking but baseless claims, hoping to cause cancellations.
“The con chair and I are lawyers so we are thorough. The material you provided was helpful but it was the several conventions we contacted that confirmed your character. They all spoke quite fondly of you.” [reference upon request]
“I wasn’t going to judge you based on an anonymous email. Because we’re a municipality, our city attorneys reviewed the claims and found them meritless.” [reference upon request]
This post names the two individuals behind this and provides insight to their true motives, a full timeline and all relevant facts. There is supplemental information here (“public reaction“). For legal purposes and to protect others from further harassment, referral information for third parties, as well as supporting documents/private correspondence referred to, will not be published online. They are only available to conventions upon request through D.C. Douglas’s representatives.
A Message To Fans:
Though these accusations are old and long since debunked, I understand they might be jarring or upsetting if you’re just seeing them now for the first time. That’s why this page exists—to give you the full context, share the facts, and hopefully offer some clarity and reassurance.
Ultimately, it will require your own critical thinking to sift through the details, people, and their intentions. I know, we aren’t in twitter anymore, Dorothy.
“The burden of proof lies with the person making the claim…”
Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat.
⚠️ Do not contact or harass these individuals. ⚠️
I recognize that behind every action, even hurtful ones, there’s often pain or struggle. It’s important that I approach this situation with understanding, even as I defend myself. I ask that you do the same.
Quick Jump Links:
↪ Background: Peyton Waukau
↪ Background: Heather Vandagriff
↪ Public Reaction
↪ Allegations Debunked
↪ Suing For Defamation
↪ F.A.Q.
↪ More Reading
Background: Peyton Waukau (2018–2021)
2018: Peyton Waukau and I had a consensual acquaintanceship that involved three one-night stands and about 20 text exchanges before her behavior changed radically.
To clarify, while we met at a convention, she was not a fan of mine and did not display any parasocial characteristics.
After Peyton’s change in behavior, I discontinued all contact with her.
2019: Peyton began a pattern of harassment — reaching out to my friends, posting vague accusations online, and attempting to rally support using anonymous Twitter accounts.
At first, her claims were relatively minor: calling me an “alcoholic philanderer” or “womanizer.”
When these failed to gain traction, she escalated — weaponizing the trust and urgency of the #MeToo movement to falsely accuse me of sexual assault, then falsely labeling me a predator, rapist and even a pedophile.
As an example of her “kitchen sink” approach, she posted that I sexually accosted unwilling audience members on stage at my popular Notorious Zombie-Related Erotic Fanfic Show — an illogical claim to anyone familiar with the show (you can now enjoy the full show here for context).
Peyton posted (and quickly deleted) that she was in touch with a group of “D.C.’s victims” who were waiting for the “right time to come forward.” That was ago. No victims materialized.
2019–2021: Peyton created the anonymous account @BewareCreepyVAs, which she used to smear me and others in the voice over industry.
Despite aggressive online tactics — including reaching out to #IStandWithVic fans (who disliked my politics) and hate forums (e.g. KiwiFarms) to amplify her accusations — Peyton’s campaign failed.
Organizers, colleagues, and fans recognized the accusations for what they were: anonymous rumors without substance.
While Peyton’s primary harassment campaign ended around 2021, the @BewareCreepyVAs account remains active. It appears to still be operated by Peyton occasionally, with possible involvement from Heather Vandagriff.
For further insight, public reaction to her initial campaign can be read here.
Unpublished letters and texts further illustrate her progression toward fabricating these accusations, available to conventions upon request.
While Peyton’s actions caused me significant distress initially, I acknowledge that her behavior may stem from personal difficulties or past experiences. This doesn’t excuse the false allegations, but it helps to contextualize them.
Background: Heather Vandagriff (2021–Present)
2021: Heather Vandagriff — a longtime fan who had initially defended me against Peyton’s attacks — “split black” after I questioned her management of a Fans of D.C. Douglas Discord server she had created without my knowledge.
Following that break, Heather aligned herself with Peyton’s narrative — knowing that was the best way to hurt me — and began a coordinated harassment effort.
She started reposting Peyton’s false claims, adding her own fabricated messages, and even posing as “concerned fans” across Reddit, Twitter, and Facebook to spread the misinformation.
Heather’s tactics included:
- Taking private messages out of context to create a false appearance of misconduct
- Faking screenshots of conversations
- Contacting conventions directly to warn them with fabricated allegations
- Posting public comments under convention announcements in an attempt to shame organizers into canceling my appearances
2022: Heather narrowed her harassment mainly to replying on social media whenever a convention announced me as a guest, posting shocking but false accusations — including the claim that I was the “Bill Cosby of conventions.”
Despite her efforts, conventions that reviewed the claims found no evidence and chose to ignore or block her communications.
Today, Heather remains the only source of any harassment activity targeting my bookings.
An example of her emails can be read here.
Her pattern is predictable: post false accusations, attack others who refute her, and then disappear when blocked.
As with Peyton, no victims have come forward, no police reports have been filed, and no credible evidence has been produced.
Do not engage with nor harass Heather. I recognize that people sometimes lash out when they’re dealing with their own pain or disappointment. This understanding doesn’t validate her actions but, again, contextualizes the situation.
ℹ️ NOTE:
Several individuals who have also been targeted by Heather for harassment have contacted me. To those people, I understand what you’re going through but I am only able to engage in communication through your legal representation. Without formal legal context, I am unable to participate or respond.
(Click here for additional information, accounts to block, emails and public reactions.)
Key Facts Debunking the Allegations
It’s tricky proving a negative. Especially when it’s a “he said – Anonymous Twitter/Reddit account said.” In the court of public opinion, this requires critical thinking.
✅ No Victims Identified Ever:
Not a single named person has ever come forward to accuse me of misconduct.
✅ No Police Reports Ever:
There have been no reports, investigations, or criminal complaints filed against me.
✅ No Civil Complaints or Lawsuits Ever:
No civil cases, restraining orders, or workplace complaints have ever been filed.
✅ No Evidence Produced Ever:
Despite the passage of , neither Peyton nor Heather has presented credible proof.
Promises of “groups of victims” coming forward never materialized.
✅ Professional Convention Record:
I have appeared at over 130 conventions worldwide without a single incident, complaint, or concern from attendees, staff, or organizers. Only very positive reviews.
✅ Accuser’s Pattern of Harassment:
Both individuals have used anonymous accounts, fake screenshots, and public defamation tactics — often posting shocking accusations with no evidence just before an event to try to force cancellations.
✅ Most Conventions Recognize the Pattern:
Event organizers familiar with these attacks now routinely ignore or block the harassment efforts after reviewing the facts.
Below are excerpts from public tweets.
• “Yeah she’s [Peyton Waukau] a repeat stalker and has caused loads of drama in the con community. Best to avoid at all costs”
• “No one has ever had a bad thing to say about D.C. at any convention I’ve been to or worked at, and I’m the type that not only wont sweep something like that under the rug.”
• “The idea that you’d ever be sexually inappropriate or even slightly creepy towards women is hilarious to me.”
• “I just went and did a scroll through on her [Peyton Waukau] IG. Wow. That’s all I got. I’m sorry this is what you’re dealing with. I’ve got your back.”
Legal Context
Given the false nature of these allegations, I have the legal right to pursue defamation and harassment claims.
However, after consulting with attorneys, I chose not to engage in a prolonged and costly court process for several reasons:
- No financial recovery would be likely:
Neither individual has the assets or public platform to make a lawsuit meaningful. - Time and energy would be wasted:
Litigation could drag on for years with little to no practical benefit, distracting from my career and personal life. - The false accusations have no traction:
No victims, no complaints, and no real-world consequences have resulted from their actions among fans, industry peers, or conventions.
A FINAL NOTE
It’s worth remembering: I’m the only one involved in this who didn’t hide behind an alias. My name’s on every word in the post—and I’m legally accountable for all of it.
In any real-world context, the facts presented here would matter. Online? They fragment, distort and vanish into algorithmic noise.
So I encourage you—think critically.
Here are some things you can do If you’re upset about Peyton Waukau and Heather Vandagriff’s actions:
✅ If you know someone who has fallen for their defamation campaign, send them this post so they can see the facts and make up their own mind.
✅ Report their accounts or comments on X, IG, Reddit, et al.
✅ Always question the motives behind anonymous accounts.
Back when this trended in November 2021, so many of you stood by me and called out the fake accounts for what they were. Thank you. That support let me stay focused on my career, my life—and, most importantly, my two cats.
🎗️ Remember:
Supporting survivors of SA means we must also ensure that bad actors do not undermine this movement for justice.
False accusations harm survivors by weakening the fight against real assault.
F.A.Q.
1. Why do they keep making these false allegations online?
Because even minor public recognition can attract unhealthy attention. Unfortunately, some individuals develop fixations or grievances they can’t let go of. You can read more about the phenomenon of celebrity harassment at Mercer.edu and about casual dating stalking at Psychology Today.
(Though they have ceased for the most part – 2024)
2. Is there any truth to the allegations?
None whatsoever. There have been no victims, no reports, no witnesses, and no credible evidence — ever.
3. I Believe All Women
I understand the sentiment and cause. But it’s important to note that the original phrase was “Believe women” — not “all.” That distinction matters.
False reports to police are rare (5–10%), but to those falsely accused, due process and facts still matter.
4. Have any conventions banned D.C. Douglas because of these allegations?
No. Most discredit them at first glance. A few have had their legal departments investigate further and then booked me.
5. What proof do you have that the allegations are false?
The allegations lack any named victim, report, or verifiable evidence. I have laid out timelines, context, and documentation in this section and this supplemental page.
6. Why haven’t you sued for defamation?
Because the allegations have no real-world impact. After consulting with attorneys, it was clear that legal action would be costly, time-consuming, and offer no meaningful benefit.
7. Methinks thou doth protest too much
Not a question, but a quote! This is detailed because I want to make the full response available once — not repeat myself endlessly online.
8. Have these people been held accountable for their false claims?
Not through the courts, but many in the fan and convention community have called them out.
9. How should fans and conventions respond to these rumors?
Look at the facts before drawing conclusions: Are the accusations from verifiable, named sources? Any named victims? Any law enforcement or court validation?
10. WHY PUT/KEEP ALL THIS ONLINE?
Because the internet is forever, and I want my side to be visible when someone Googles the rumors.
11. Are you still working in voiceover and attending conventions?
Yes. See IMdB and Instagram for upcoming work and appearances.
12. Where can I find accurate information about D.C. Douglas?
DCDouglas.com, Instagram @MRDCDouglas, or in person.
13. How can I support you?
By reading this with an open mind. Thank you!
Now that you’re here, why not enjoy the fun stuff:
MORE READING
• Why do people spread false information online?
• False Accusations, Scapegoats, and the Power of Words.
• The Accusations Were Lies. But Could We Prove It?
• Could False Accusations Threaten the #MeToo Movement?
• Misinformation and Its Correction.
• Rumors: How They Spread and How to Combat Them.
• How to protect yourself from problematic fake news.
• How to develop critical thinking skills.
Background Information
This page compiles verifiable, publicly available information regarding individuals who have made online claims about D.C. Douglas. The purpose is to help those seeking context and clarity. No private addresses, phone numbers, or other sensitive personal data are listed.
Heather Vandagriff
Full Name: Heather Ann Vandagriff
Born: 1992
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Profiles (public):
Wikipedia – DeadDoveMoli
Myspace
LinkedIn
Foursquare
Buffalo Exchange (LinkedIn)
Toys “R” Us (LinkedIn)
Email: [email protected]
Social handles: @lovesocriminal, @xhercoldhands, @burnside_fan, TikTok: @Heather.deaddove, Reddit: @Molcocktease, Instagram: @leatherette.eyes, @broken.birb, @ClubAlchemy505
Please do not contact or harass this individual.
Known Associates (public records): Alberta M Vandagriff, Doug R Vandagriff, Brandy K Vandagriff, Ann A Vandagriff, Jarrod Frederick Ritter, Peggy D Vanpatten, Kris Lindh, Mzy M, Aaron Ami.
Peyton Waukau
Name: Peyton Waukau
Born: 1997
Location: Madison, De Pere, and Oneida, Wisconsin
Profiles (public):
Twitter: @bewarecreepyvas, @lilymaycosplay
Instagram: @bewarecreepyvas
Email: [email protected], [email protected]
Please do not contact or harass this individual.
Known Associates (public records): Pamela Dreikosen, Kathleen Dreikosen
Work (publicly listed research contribution):
Co-authored a presentation at Aurora Health Care, USA: “Does Stool Based Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Lead to Early Incidence of Breakthrough CRC or Advanced Polyps?”
Context
Over many years, no named victims, police reports, or corroborating evidence have emerged to support the claims made online. Over 130 convention appearances have occurred without reported incidents or complaints. These points suggest that the allegations remain unsubstantiated.
Online accusations and harassment campaigns can spread quickly due to the nature of social media and the tendency to assume “where there’s smoke, there’s fire.” While these dynamics can complicate public perception, the absence of verifiable evidence remains significant.